Your state's law shown on the case, not just claimed. Try the demo
Write one free

A legally-sound corrective action letter in under 3 minutes, cited to your state, every time.

FairFile turns the facts of an incident into a structured, cited, state-compliant written warning or PIP, so a routine write-up stops depending on a $300-an-hour attorney or a guess pulled from Reddit.

The only tool that shows the state law behind every clause, tracks the whole disciplinary record as one case, and is the first standalone product built for exactly this job.

$600
Typical per-hour attorney rate to draft one letter ($300–$600)
$80,000
Average wrongful-termination settlement this documentation is built to help you avoid ($40K–$80K)
3 min
Time to a structured, cited first draft
Thanks — we'll email you when your state's requirements change.

✓ Live now, real pricing below ✓ No credit card to try it ✓ Try the sample generator below first

A look at the app you can use right now

Split-screen live letter generation with inline statute citations appearing as the letter streams in. Split-screen live letter generation with inline statute citations appearing as the letter streams in, dark mode.
The letter writes itself, with the law attached.Plain-English facts in, a structured, cited written warning out, in real time.
Risk-flagging interstitial pausing letter generation to flag a recent FMLA return before a written warning issues. Risk-flagging interstitial pausing letter generation to flag a recent FMLA return before a written warning issues, dark mode.
It stops you before you make a costly mistake.A recent protected leave pauses the letter and recommends attorney review, automatically.
PIP builder with SMART-goal milestone timeline, mid-cycle at checkpoint two, with a state-leave guardrail note. PIP builder with SMART-goal milestone timeline, mid-cycle at checkpoint two, dark mode.
A real improvement plan, not a form letter.SMART-goal checkpoints on a timeline, with state-leave interactions handled as it builds.
State compliance library with California selected, showing four cited statute requirement cards and a cross-state comparison table. State compliance library with California selected, dark mode.
Your state's law, cited and kept current.Switch the state and watch the exact statutes and requirements change underneath the same incident.
Employee case history and audit trail showing a progressive-discipline ladder, three chronological entries, and one-click export. Employee case history and audit trail, dark mode.
One case, not a folder of loose letters.Every verbal warning, written notice, and signature lives on one timeline, ready to export if a claim is ever filed.
Where defensible documents get written: FairFile applies the right state's employment law as the document drafts.
The problem

"Document, document, document everything," but nobody tells you what actually counts.

HR generalists and small-business owners with no in-house counsel are told to build a paper trail before disciplining or terminating an employee. Few can afford $300–$600-an-hour attorney review for a routine write-up, so the default becomes crowdsourcing advice from Reddit and SHRM threads and hoping the wording holds up.

Skipping a $300–$500 attorney-reviewed document routinely trades a small, known cost for a $4,000 to $250,000-plus unknown one. It is a balance-sheet problem hiding behind a paperwork problem.

$150–$600+per attorney-drafted or reviewed warning letter
$4,000–$8,000added payroll tax over 3–5 years from a lost unemployment claim caused by missing documentation
$40,000–$80,000average wrongful-termination settlement; $50,000–$250,000 total including defense
30–50%rise in EPLI premiums after a single filed claim (on a base of roughly $2,665/yr)
“Document, document, document everything!”
“At will means you can fire for no reason, but you could end up with a higher unemployment tax if you don't do it this way [without documentation].”
“Your first reaction shouldn't be to fire staff that you allowed to stay without proper documentation of any performance issues.”
Try it

Generate a sample letter, right here.

Prefilled with a real attendance case. Change the state and watch the citations change. This is a demo of the planned product: nothing here is sent anywhere yet.

New written warning · sample / demo
Drafting, citing state law as it writes…

Click Generate sample letter to see a structured, cited written warning appear here, paragraph by paragraph.

Everything the market asks for, in one product

The best of every tool, and the gaps none of them fill.

Every direct competitor is one template inside a bigger legal-document or HR-toolkit platform. This is the first standalone product built for exactly this job, combining the best of what buyers ask for with the compliance rigor none of them show.

Only FairFile

State law shown, not just claimed

A maintained, cited state-law dataset appears inline as the letter generates. Competitors assert "multi-jurisdiction ready"; this shows the specific statute behind every clause.

Live today for 47 of 50 states, including California, Texas, Florida, and New York. We only show a citation we can verify against the state's own code: if we cannot, we leave it off rather than guess.

Only FairFile

One connected case, not loose documents

Verbal warning through written warning through PIP through termination lives as one auditable timeline. The one enterprise tool that does this costs five to six figures a year.

Only FairFile

The first standalone product for this job

Every real competitor is one of 200 templates inside a broader platform. This is focused product, focused trust, focused execution, not a bolted-on feature.

Tone control: Professional, Constructive, Firm

Live preview of how word choice shifts, with guardrails so Firm never reads as pretextual or punitive.

Fact-specific language, not vague labels

Flags vague inputs like "often late" or "bad attitude" before generating, since vague documentation is the top-cited reason a write-up fails to hold up.

Risk-flagging for FMLA, ADA, and retaliation exposure

Recent protected leave, a workers' comp claim, or a disability accommodation pauses generation and recommends attorney review, before the letter issues.

PDF/DOCX export with company branding

Clean formatting built to survive a paste into the company's own letterhead.

Built-in e-signature and acknowledgment

Includes a plain-language explainer that a refusal to sign does not invalidate the document, answering the most repeated confusion in the community scan.

Consistency-across-managers guardrail

An org-level severity and tone baseline, so similar conduct produces similarly worded documentation and reduces disparate-treatment risk.

SMART-goal PIP with timeline and review cadence

Standard structure plus state-aware language for how a PIP period interacts with state leave law, which no PIP-only tool addresses.

Attorney-review backstop for high-risk cases

Transparently priced add-on triggered automatically by risk-flagging, never buried behind a hard-to-cancel subscription.

Transparent pricing, working cancel path

Pricing shown before signup, usage-based billing, no auto-renew trap, and a cancel button that actually works: the market's single most-requested fix.

How we compare

Every feature they have, and the ones they don't.

Every claim below reflects each product's own public pages and pricing at the time of research. We win outright on most rows and match the best enterprise or indie option on the rest.

Feature FairFile AI Lawyer Pro Makeform AI SixFifty Rocket Lawyer Genie AI Hyring
Purpose-built for corrective action / PIP, not bolted onto a broader platform WinNoNoNoNo NoNo
Real state-by-state compliance, cited inline, not just claimed WinClaimed onlyNoMatch (attorney-built)Partial Claimed onlyNo
Progressive-discipline ladder tracked as one case over time WinNoPartial (templates only)Match (policy-level)No NoNo
Tone control (Professional / Constructive / Firm) WinNoNoNoNo NoPartial (3 styles)
Risk-flagging for FMLA / ADA / retaliation exposure WinNoNoPartial (policy content)No NoNo
Fact-specific prompting (dates, specifics, measurable impact enforced) WinNoNoMatchNo NoNo
Case history / audit trail across an employee WinNoNoMatch (policy-level)Partial (document storage) NoNo
Attorney-review add-on for high-risk cases MatchPartial (paid add-on)NoMatch (built-in)Match (paid membership) NoNo
Transparent pricing shown before signup WinNoNoNo (custom quote)No MatchMatch (free)
Simple, visible cancellation path WinReported friction (user reviews)N/A (free)N/A (contract)Reported friction (user reviews) N/AN/A (free)
Digital signature / acknowledgment built in WinNoMatchNoMatch NoMatch
Speed (under a minute to a first draft) WinMatchMatchNo (policy platform)No NoMatch
One-time-purchase option, no subscription required WinNoNoNoNo No (subscription)Match (free)
Priced for SMB / solo HR, not an enterprise contract WinMatchMatchNo ($75/mo+ to $5K+/yr)Match MatchMatch
Data privacy / retention stated plainly WinUnclearUnclearMatchUnclear UnclearUnclear
Win: we do this and they don't Match: comparable capability Partial / unclear No / not applicable

Prefer a head-to-head? Each comparison leads by naming where the other tool is genuinely stronger, then makes the fair case.

FairFile vs HR Acuity FairFile vs SixFifty FairFile vs Rocket Lawyer FairFile vs Genie AI FairFile vs free templates
See all comparisons →

Comparisons reflect each company's own public pages and pricing at time of research (2026). "Reported friction" refers to patterns described in public user reviews, not a FairFile-verified claim about any specific account.

Why now

The industry we serve, by the numbers.

What follows is real, sourced commentary from HR generalists, managers, and small-business owners describing the exact problem this product is built to solve.

Zero customers yet: every quote below is an industry voice, not a FairFile testimonial
“I suggested that we issue a write-up, outline the areas where improvement is needed, discuss what resources the company could provide for success, and establish a timeline for review.”
“Document their inadequate performance thoroughly… keep a thorough record of everything.”
Industry voice, not a FairFile testimonialr/managers
“Gave my first write-up and it didn't go well.”
“Not signing an internal write-up doesn't invalidate the write-up.”
Industry voice, not a FairFile testimonialr/AskHR
The math

Priced like insurance, not like software.

An attorney charges $300 to $600 an hour to draft one letter. A single wrongful-termination claim this documentation is built to help you avoid settles for $40,000 to $80,000 on average. This costs a fraction of one attorney hour and takes three minutes.

$59
FairFile, per document, a fraction of one attorney hour
$150–$600+
Attorney-drafted or reviewed letter, per document
$40K–$80K
Average wrongful-termination settlement this documentation helps you avoid

The premium tier is not an expense to justify against a free tool. It is cheap insurance against the $4,000-to-$250,000 range documentation failure actually costs, priced at a fraction of one attorney hour for the same letter.

Bars are not to scale; each step up represents an order-of-magnitude jump in cost.

Pricing

Simple pricing, shown before you ever sign up.

Write a full document for free and read every word of it before you decide. Paid plans unlock export, the employee file, and the rest of the suite.

Preview

See the whole thing first

Free
One full draft, watermarked. Export, copy, and print unlock on any paid plan.
  • A complete, structured document
  • State-law citations shown inline
  • Risk flags before you commit anything to the file
Write one free

Single document

One defensible document, right now

$59 / document
No subscription. A fraction of one attorney hour to draft the same document.
  • One structured, cited document of any type
  • PDF export with your letterhead
  • Built-in e-signature request
Buy one document

Team

For an HR team, not one person

$249 / month
Everything in Pro, across your whole team. Seven days free, cancel anytime.
  • Multiple seats on one account
  • Shared template library
  • Audit-trail export for the employee file
  • Priority support
Start with Team
The Epiphani Promise

30 days. Any reason. Every cent back.

Every paid plan carries a 30-day money-back guarantee. Not for you, for any reason at all? Email hello@fairfilehr.com within 30 days of purchase and we refund the full price: approved and sent within one business day, and your bank controls when it posts. Cancel in one click. We put that in writing.

And the file guarantee: if the employee files you build here are not organized, complete against our published checklist, and exportable within your first 30 days, the same refund applies. The exact terms, in plain language.

Attorney review, from $149 per case. A licensed employment attorney reviews a document before you send it. Offered automatically when risk-flagging triggers, on any plan; never required, never hidden.

FairFile is a professional documentation tool, not a law firm, and its output is not legal advice. We recommend attorney review for high-risk situations (recent protected leave, disability accommodation, workers' compensation, or any discrimination complaint), and the attorney-review add-on above exists for exactly that.

Transparent pricing shown up front, and a cancel path that works, no exceptions. Not ready to start? Leave your email and we will send you what changes in employment documentation, no more than monthly.

Thanks. We'll email you when something in employment documentation actually changes.
What it covers

Built for the disciplinary record.

  • A drafting and risk tool, not a law firm. No attorney-client relationship is created, and where a letter needs review before it goes out, FairFile says so.
  • The verified state-law library covers 47 states, each with its own verification date and update procedure published at /methodology, so you can check the ground under any letter you send.
  • Purpose-built for employee corrective action: warnings, performance improvement plans, and the disciplinary record itself, which is the paperwork that actually gets litigated.
  • Three plans, Single, Pro and Team, plus an attorney-review add-on when a letter warrants a second pair of eyes.
FAQ

The questions we expect you to ask.

A general-purpose chatbot produces language, not a compliance-checked document: no state-law citations, no case history, no risk-flagging for FMLA/ADA/retaliation, and no memory of the last letter you wrote for the same employee. FairFile requires the specific facts up front, cites the governing statute inline, and tracks every letter as one connected case.
Copilot became generally available inside Microsoft 365 Business on July 1, 2026, so a bundled general assistant now sits in the same apps the buyer already uses, and it is genuinely good at drafting prose. The gap is the same as with any general assistant: it writes fluent language, but it does not show the specific state statute behind each clause, it does not flag an incident tangled up with a recent protected leave or a workers' comp claim before you generate, and it does not keep the last write-up for this employee linked into one case. FairFile is built around exactly those three things, which a general copilot is not designed to carry.
The consistency-across-managers guardrail holds an org-level severity and tone baseline, so similar conduct produces similarly worded documentation regardless of who writes it. The generator also flags vague, subjective input ("bad attitude," "poor culture fit") and asks for specific, observable facts before it will generate, which works against both weak documentation and disparate treatment.
It depends on the state and the situation. Try the live demo above: switch the state dropdown and watch the cited requirements change for the same incident. That is the actual mechanism, not a marketing claim.
A refusal to sign does not invalidate the document. Every letter includes a plain-language note to that effect, and the case record simply logs the refusal alongside the date and any witness present.
FairFile is a professional documentation tool, not a law firm, and its output is not legal advice. When risk-flagging detects a recent protected leave, a workers' compensation claim, a disability accommodation, or a discrimination complaint, it recommends the attorney-review add-on before the letter issues. For anything outside routine, low-risk documentation, loop in real counsel.
Pricing is shown in full above, before you ever sign up: write one document free and watermarked, $59 for a single document, $99 a month for unlimited documents and the employee file, or $249 a month for a whole HR team. No hidden auto-renew, and cancellation is a single click, directly answering the market's most common billing complaint.
Ready when you are

Stop staring at a blank page for a high-stakes letter.

Try the sample generator above first, no credit card. Pricing is live above whenever you're ready.

Thanks — we'll email you when your state's requirements change.
See pricing